Detalhes do Documento

Comparison of different modelling strategies for the representation of non line...

Autor(es): Rodrigues, H. cv logo 1 ; Varum, H. cv logo 2 ; Arêde, A. cv logo 3 ; Costa, A. cv logo 4

Data: 2011

Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/6853

Origem: RIA - Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro

Assunto(s): RC columns; Non-linear behaviour; Biaxial bending; Fibre modelling


Descrição
Aiming at studying the performance of different non-linear modelling strategies for RC columns subjected to axial load and cyclic biaxial horizontal loading, several analyses were developed using the computer code SeismoStruct. This study comprised the simulation of 24 cantilever RC columns quasi-statically tested under constant axial force and cyclic uniaxial and biaxial displacements imposed with different loading paths. The results show that all adopted modelling strategies (distributed-inelasticity and lumped-plasticity) lead to similar accuracy in terms of restoring shear-force evolution. Generically, they were found suitable for accurately predicting the cyclic response of RC columns, with standard material parameters, although the models may not succeed in representing the strength degradation for cyclic loading.
Tipo de Documento Documento de conferência
Idioma Inglês
delicious logo  facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
degois logo
mendeley logo

Documentos Relacionados



    Financiadores do RCAAP

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Universidade do Minho   Governo Português Ministério da Educação e Ciência Programa Operacional da Sociedade do Conhecimento União Europeia