Document details

Assessing the quality of the relation between scalarizing function parameters a...

Author(s): Ferreira, José C. cv logo 1 ; Fonseca, Carlos M. cv logo 2 ; Gaspar-Cunha, A. cv logo 3

Date: 2009

Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/18839

Origin: RepositóriUM - Universidade do Minho


Description
Different Multi-Objective Optimization Methods (MOOM) for solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problems (MOOP) have been suggested in the literature. These methods often comprise two stages (not necessarily sequential): i) the search for the Pareto-optimal set and ii) the selection of a single solution from this non-dominated set. Various studies comparing performance of particular aspects of these methods have been carried out. However, a theoretical support that changes on the preferences of a Decision Maker (DM) will be reflected in the same way on the solution of the MOOP given by the MOOM has not been presented. In this work a consistency measure to assess MOOM is proposed. It will used to compare the performance of different methods available in the literature. This study was performed using some benchmark test problems, with two criteria.
Document Type Conference Object
Language English
delicious logo  facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
degois logo
mendeley logo

Related documents



    Financiadores do RCAAP

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Universidade do Minho   Governo Português Ministério da Educação e Ciência Programa Operacional da Sociedade do Conhecimento EU