Document details

A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques ...

Author(s): Mesquita, D. P. cv logo 1 ; Dias, O. cv logo 2 ; Amaral, A. L. cv logo 3 ; Ferreira, E. C. cv logo 4

Date: 2010

Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/10530

Origin: RepositóriUM - Universidade do Minho

Subject(s): Activated sludge; Image analysis; Bright field; Phase contrast; Aggregates; Filaments


Description
Different approaches using microscopy image analysis procedures were employed for characterization of activated sludge systems. The approaches varied mainly on the type of visualization and acquisition method used for collection of data. In this context, this study focused on the comparison of the two most common acquisition methods: bright field and phase-contrast microscopy. Images were acquired from seven different wastewater treatment plants for a combined period of two years. Advantages and disadvantages of each acquisition technique and the results are discussed. Bright field microscopy proved to be more simple and inexpensive and provided the best overall results.
Document Type Article
Language English
delicious logo  facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
degois logo
mendeley logo

Related documents



    Financiadores do RCAAP

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Universidade do Minho   Governo Português Ministério da Educação e Ciência Programa Operacional da Sociedade do Conhecimento EU