The provenance of Late Ediacaran and Early Ordovician siliciclastic rocks in th...

• Author(s): Pereira, M.F. ; Linnemann, U. ; Hofmann, M. ; Chichorro, M. ; Solá, A.R ; Medina, J. ; Silva, J.B.
• Date: 2012
• Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/5438
• Origin: Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora
• Subject(s): Provenance analysis; Northern Gondwana margin; Avalonian–Cadomian magmatic arc; CentralIberian; West African craton; Amazonian craton
• Document Type: Article
• Language: English

Description

U–Pb geochronology of detrital zircon from Late Ediacaran (Beiras Group greywackes) and Early Ordovician (Sarnelhas arkosic quartzites and Armorican quartzites of Penacova) sedimentary rocks of the southwest Central Iberian Zone (SW CIZ) constrain the evolution of northern Gondwana activepassive margin transition. The LAICPMS U–Pb data set (375 detrital zircons with 90–110% concordant ages) is dominated by Neoproterozoic ages (75% for the greywakes and 60% for the quartzites), among which the main age cluster (more significant for Beiras Group greywackes) is Cryogenian (c.840–750 Ma), while a few Mesoproterozoic and Tonian ages are also present (percentages <8%). These two features, and the predominance of Cryogenian ages over Ediacaran ages, distinguish the Beiras Group greywackes (SW CIZ) from the timeequivalent Serie Negra (OssaMorena Zone – OMZ), with which they are in inferred contact. The age spectra of the Beiras Group greywackes also reveal three major episodes of zircon crystallisation in the source area during the Neoproterozoic that are probably associated with a longlived system of magmatism that developed either along or in the vicinity of the northern Gondwana margin at: (1) c. 850–700 Ma – PanAfrican suture (not well represented in OMZ); (2) c. 700–635 Ma – early Cadomian arc; and (3) c. 635–545 Ma – late Cadomian arc. Comparison of Neoproterozoic ages and those of the Paleoproterozoic (c. 2–1.8 Ga) and Archean (mainly Neoarchean – 2.8–2.6 Ga, but also older) in the Beiras Group greywackes with U–Pb ages of Cadomian correlatives shows that: (1) SW CIZ, OMZ, SaxoThuringian Zone, North Armorican Cadomian Belt and AntiAtlas) evolved together during the formation of backarc basins on the northern Gondwana active margin and (2) all recorded synorogenic basins that were filled during the Ediacaran by detritus resulting from erosion of the West African craton, the PanAfrican suture and a longlived Cadomian magmatic arc. Differences in detrital zircon age populations in the greywackes of the Beiras Group (SW CIZ Cadomian basement) and the Serie Negra (OMZ Cadomian basement) are also observed in their respective overlying Early Ordovician quartzites. Since both these SW Iberia Cadomian basements evolved together along the active margin of Gondwana (but sufficiently separated to account for the differences in their detrital zircon content), this continuation of differing zircon populations into the Early Ordovician suggests that the inferred contact presently juxtaposing the Beiras Group and the Serie Negra is not preEarly Ordovician and so is unlikely to demonstrate a Cadomian suture.