Detalhes do Documento

The evolution of swimming science research: Content analysis of the “Biomechani...

Autor(es): Barbosa, Tiago M. cv logo 1 ; Pinto, E. cv logo 2 ; Cruz, A.M. cv logo 3 ; Marinho, D.A. cv logo 4 ; Silva, A.J. cv logo 5 ; Reis, V.M. cv logo 6 ; Costa, M.J. cv logo 7 ; Queirós, Telma Maria Gonçalves cv logo 8

Data: 2010

Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/3544

Origem: Biblioteca Digital do IPB

Assunto(s): Research; Content analysis; Aquatic activities; Sport sciences


Descrição
The aim of this study was to analyze the evolution of the swimming science research based on the content analysis of the “Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming” Proceeding books series from 1971 to 2006. The content of all the 622 papers published in the Proceeding books of the Symposiums of Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming were evaluated. Two main categories were defined: (i) The “Aquatic activity” studied in each paper analyzed (included the sub-categories Competitive swimming, Water Polo, Synchronized Swimming, Diving, Hydrotherapy, Infant Swim, Head-out Aquatic Exercises, Fin Swimming and others) and; (ii) The main “scientific area” (including the sub-categories Biomechanics, Psychology, Sociology, Pedagogy/Teaching, Biochemistry, Physiology, Thermoregulation, Hydrodynamics, Electromyography, Anthropometry, Equipments/Methodologies, Clinical Medicine/Traumatology and Interdisciplinary assessment) applied for the assessment. There was an increasing number of papers published within the period of time analyzed (ranging from 23 papers in 1971 to 145 manuscripts in 2006). Comparing the sub-categories related to “Aquatic activity” the one with more research done was clearly the “competitive swimming” (ranging from 78.8 % in 1971 to 100 % in 1996). In the last decade there is a slight but increasing interest in “head-out aquatic exercises” (e.g., being the second most studied aquatic activity in 2006 with 6.9 %). Analyzing the main “scientific area” of study, “Biomechanics” was the most often assessed area (ranging from 27.3 % in 1988 to 60 % in 1979), followed by the “Physiology”. Since 2003 an increasing trend in “interdisciplinary assessment” manuscripts was verified (e.g., 9.7 % in 2003 and 21.4 % in 2006, shifting from the third to second area of interest).
Tipo de Documento Artigo
Idioma Inglês
delicious logo  facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
degois logo
mendeley logo

Documentos Relacionados



    Financiadores do RCAAP

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Universidade do Minho   Governo Português Ministério da Educação e Ciência Programa Operacional da Sociedade do Conhecimento União Europeia